Unravelling The Legacy Of The Nuclear Bomb I Oxford Open Learning


    Unravelling The Legacy Of The Nuclear Bomb

    The Lingering Shadow

    Seventy-eight years have passed since the devastating use of the atomic bomb in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, yet its legacy continues to shape the world profoundly. The profound impact of these bombings has given rise to a complex web of consequences, ranging from the Cold War and nuclear proliferation to the push for peace and disarmament. Furthermore, the ethical dilemma surrounding the use of such a weapon still looms large over humanity. In this blog post, we will delve into the multifaceted legacy of the atomic bomb, exploring how it has influenced global politics, security policies, and societal attitudes towards nuclear weapons.

    The Cold War and Nuclear Proliferation

    The use of atomic bombs during World War II had an unprecedented effect on global politics. It marked the dawn of the nuclear age and catalysed the ideological struggle between the two superpowers – the United States and the Soviet Union. The ensuing Cold War was defined by a tense rivalry, with both nations seeking to expand their spheres of influence across the globe.

    The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki demonstrated the sheer destructive power of nuclear weapons, leading to an arms race that spiralled out of control. Other countries sought to acquire nuclear capabilities to enhance their security or exert influence on the global stage. This nuclear proliferation heightened tensions and raised concerns about the potential for a catastrophic nuclear conflict.

    Decades later, the number of nuclear-armed states increased, further complicating international relations. The possession of nuclear weapons became a means of asserting geopolitical dominance and, simultaneously, a source of unease for the international community.

    The Push for Peace and Disarmament

    The horrific consequences of the atomic bombings spurred a strong global reaction, leading to a fervent anti-nuclear movement. People around the world came together, calling for disarmament and an end to the development and testing of nuclear weapons.

    As a result of this movement, several landmark disarmament and arms control treaties were negotiated. The most notable of these is the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), signed in 1968. The NPT aims to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and promote peaceful uses of nuclear energy. It has played a significant role in slowing down the proliferation of nuclear weapons and has been instrumental in establishing a framework for disarmament negotiations.

    Moreover, non-governmental organisations such as the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) have tirelessly advocated for a nuclear-free world. In 2017, ICAN was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for its efforts in raising awareness about the humanitarian consequences of nuclear weapons and its role in the adoption of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.

    Despite these efforts, complete nuclear disarmament remains an elusive goal. Some nuclear-armed states argue that their arsenals serve as a deterrent, preventing large-scale conflicts. However, the push for peace and disarmament continues, driven by the belief that a world without nuclear weapons is essential for humanity’s survival.

    The Ethical Dilemma

    The use of the atomic bomb, then, has provoked heated ethical debates that persist to this day. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki raised profound questions about the morality of using such a catastrophic weapon, especially against civilian populations. Yet, even in the face of this, proponents of the bombings argue that they brought a swift end to World War II, potentially saving millions of lives that might have been lost in a prolonged conflict. They contend that the bombings forced Japan’s surrender and eliminated the need for a costly invasion of the Japanese mainland.

    Critics vehemently disagree, asserting that targeting densely populated cities and causing immense civilian casualties cannot be justified under any circumstances. They argue that the principle of proportionality was grossly violated, as the devastation caused by the bombs far exceeded any military objective. The ethical implications of such actions continue to be a point of contention among scholars, policymakers, and the general public.


    The legacy of the atomic bomb is both far-reaching and complex. The destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki triggered a nuclear arms race that led to an era of geopolitical tensions and nuclear proliferation, but at the same time, it also sparked a global movement that pursued peace and disarmament, seeking to eliminate the spectre of mutually assured destruction. Ethical debates surrounding the bombings continue to remind us of the grave consequences of such actions, and prompt us to reflect on our responsibilities as custodians of our shared humanity.

    As we confront the challenges of the 21st century, the legacy of the atomic bomb serves as a sombre reminder of the destructive power humanity wields, and of the urgent need for concerted efforts to ensure lasting peace and nuclear disarmament. To secure a safer and more peaceful world, we must draw from the lessons of history and work together towards the ultimate goal of a world free from the threat of nuclear annihilation.


    For a broader look on this subject and the bomb’s creator, why not check out this article: oppenheimer-and-the-atomic-bomb.

    You can also get a better understanding of why these weapons were brought into existence by following this link.

    See more by